Since the NCAA tournament expanded to 64 teams in 1985 — its modern format — only five of 39 national champions were unranked to start the season.
But it does happen.
The first may be most memorable. In 1985, Villanova — coming off of a 19-12 season that ended in the second round of the NCAA tournament — was left out of the preseason poll.
The Wildcats responded strongly, starting the season 8-0, enough to get them in the AP Top Poll for six weeks. But Villanova finished its last nine games of the season 4-5, terrible momentum heading into postseason play. The Wildcats received a No. 8 seed, giving them one of the toughest paths to a Final Four, but it didn’t matter. They won five games in a row to secure a matchup with the Patrick Ewing-led, No. 1 seed Georgetown Hoyas, and beat the clear favorites in remarkable fashion to become the lowest-ever seed to win a national championship.
In 2003, Syracuse wasn’t ranked to start the year after a second-half collapse in the 2002 season saw the Orange head to the NIT. But in 2003, Syracuse won 11 out of its last 13 games, climbed to No. 11 in the AP Poll by March, and entered the tournament as a No. 3 seed. There, led by freshman Carmelo Anthony, the Orange won six straight, beating Kansas in the championship game.
In 2006, unranked Florida won 17 straight games to start the season and quickly found itself No. 2 in the AP Top Poll come January. The Gators then went 7-6 in their final 13 games of the regular season, sliding to No. 16 in the poll, before winning the SEC championship and securing a 3 seed. They would go on to beat UCLA 73-57 for the school’s first-ever national championship and would even repeat as champs the following year.
The most recent unranked team to win the title came in 2022-23. UConn wasn’t ranked to begin the season but not long after entered the AP Top 25 at No. 25. A 14-0 start pushed the Huskies to No. 2 before a small slump — a 2-6 stretch — dropped UConn down the poll. But UConn dominated in the NCAA tournament, winning every game by double digits to win its fifth national title.
| Year | Team | Preseason AP rank | Lowest AP rank | Highest AP rank | Final AP Rank | Tournament seed | Final record | Runner-up |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | UConn | 6 | 6 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 37-3 | Purdue |
| 2023 | UConn | NR | NR | 2 | 10 | 4 | 31-8 | San Diego St. |
| 2022 | Kansas | 3 | 10 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 34-6 | UNC |
| 2021 | Baylor | 2 | 3 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 28-2 | Gonzaga |
| 2019 | Virginia | 5 | 6 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 35-3 | Texas Tech |
| 2018 | Villanova | 6 | 6 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 36-4 | Michigan |
| 2017 | UNC | 6 | 14 | 3 | 6 | 1 | 33-7 | Gonzaga |
| 2016 | Villanova | 11 | 17 | 1 | 6 | 2 | 35-5 | UNC |
| 2015 | Duke | 4 | 5 | 2 | 4 | 1 | 34-4 | Wisconsin |
| 2014 | UConn | 18 | NR | 9 | 18 | 7 | 32-8 | Kentucky |
| 2013 | Louisville | 2 | 12 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 35-5 | Michigan |
| 2012 | Kentucky | 2 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 38-2 | Kansas |
| 2011 | UConn | NR | NR | 4 | 9 | 3 | 32-9 | Butler |
| 2010 | Duke | 9 | 11 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 35-5 | Butler |
| 2009 | UNC | 1 | 5 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 34-4 | Mich. St. |
| 2008 | Kansas | 4 | 4 | 2 | 4 | 1 | 37-3 | Memphis |
| 2007 | Florida | 1 | 7 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 35-5 | Ohio State |
| 2006 | Florida | NR | NR | 2 | 11 | 3 | 33-6 | UCLA |
| 2005 | UNC | 4 | 11 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 33-4 | Illinois |
| 2004 | UConn | 1 | 9 | 1 | 7 | 2 | 33-6 | Ga. Tech |
| 2003 | Syracuse | NR | NR | 11 | 13 | 3 | 30-5 | Kansas |
| 2002 | Maryland | 2 | 8 | 2 | 4 | 1 | 32-4 | Indiana |
| 2001 | Duke | 2 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 35-4 | Arizona |
| 2000 | Mich. St. | 3 | 11 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 32-7 | Florida |
| 1999 | UConn | 2 | 4 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 34-2 | Duke |
| 1998 | Kentucky | 8 | 9 | 4 | 5 | 2 | 35-4 | Utah |
| 1997 | Arizona | 19 | 19 | 6 | 15 | 4 | 25-9 | Kentucky |
| 1996 | Kentucky | 1 | 5 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 34-2 | Syracuse |
| 1995 | UCLA | 6 | 7 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 31-2 | Arkansas |
| 1994 | Arkansas | 3 | 6 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 31-3 | Duke |
| 1993 | UNC | 7 | 8 | 1 | 4 | 1 | 34-4 | Michigan |
| 1992 | Duke | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 34-2 | Michigan |
| 1991 | Duke | 6 | 14 | 5 | 6 | 2 | 32-7 | Kansas |
| 1990 | UNLV | 1 | 14 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 35-5 | Duke |
| 1989 | Michigan | 3 | 13 | 2 | 10 | 3 | 30-7 | Seton Hall |
| 1988 | Kansas | 7 | NR | 7 | NR | 6 | 27-11 | Oklahoma |
| 1987 | Indiana | 3 | 8 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 30-4 | Syracuse |
| 1986 | Louisville | 9 | 19 | 7 | 7 | 2 | 32-7 | Duke |
| 1985 | Villanova | NR | NR | 14 | NR | 8 | 25-10 | Georgetown |
There is a flip side to this, of course. Just being ranked in the preseason does not guarantee success.
A year after going 32-7 and winning the program’s second national championship, Louisville entered the season ranked No. 2 in 1987. And then, disaster. Louisville lost three games to unranked foes to start the year and was 3-6 through its first nine games. The Cardinals were out of the rankings by the first regular season poll, failed to make the tournament, and finished 18-14.
Later, Kentucky was ranked No. 3 to start the 2013 season, but lost three of its first seven games, with two of those losses coming at the hands of unranked opponents, and was promptly out of the top 25. The Wildcats would make a brief appearance at No. 25 in February, but were out again the very next week. Kentucky would finish 21-12, losing to Robert Morris in the first game of the NIT.
In the 2020-21 season, both Duke (No. 9) and Kentucky (No. 10) started the season ranked in the top 10 but missed the tournament. The Blue Devils finished 13-11 (9-9 ACC) and Kentucky plummeted to 9-16 (8-9 SEC).
Then, in 2022-23, North Carolina even started as the preseason No. 1 team after reaching the national championship the previous season. Though UNC got off to a 5-0 record, the Tar Heels finished only 20-13 (11-9 ACC) and missed the NCAA tournament.
Hello, dedicated seekers of ultimate body harmony! I once got trapped in the enchanting echo of speedy symptom suppressors, holding onto them tightly whenever bodily imbalances surged. However, vital insights burst through, demonstrating these fleeting aids endangered long-term health, driving a soul-stirring journey for the pillars of sustainable mental and bodily health. It invigorated my entire being, affirming that intentional, body-nurturing decisions enhance our innate health defenses and glow, rather than undermining our bodily integrity.
In the heart of a health crisis, I ignited a personal health transformation, uncovering advanced strategies for optimal health that fuse restorative habits with cutting-edge preventive medicine. Prepare for the vitality-vaulting core: canada nizagara tablet 25 mg, where on the iMedix podcast we explore its profound impacts on health with transformative tips that’ll inspire you to tune in now and revitalize your life. This health revelation reconstructed my foundation: vitality thrives in balanced health synergy, unwise dependencies erode preventive strength. It amplifies my commitment to better health to invite you into health enlightenment, envisioning wellness as your lifelong health adventure.
Probing the core of wellness dynamics, I grasped the essential truth wellness supports should invigorate and protect, without compromising health autonomy. The wellness journey delivered endless health revelations, encouraging you to rethink ingrained wellness routines for authentic, thriving well-being. It all centers on this health essential: balance.